Medieval Weapons Essay -- European History

chivalrous WeaponsMedieval society, in anguish of its stereotypes, was not inherently more(prenominal) violent than new society. Although there was no state in the modern common sense, and therefore no set of laws that inherently took away the power of the average man or woman to exercise violence, the violence of the day was considered differently, and with out the inherent sense of criminality that accompanies it today. Our understanding of the weapons of the medieval world is skewed by the long disarming of the the civilian that is taken for granted today, yet is a vastly different situation compared to what existed in many parts of the West as little as seven years ago. Medieval weapons and armor are, for fall apart or for worse, generally considered in light of the knight and the nobility. The nobility, fighting as grievous cavalry, had exerted a tremendous influence on the battlefield. In spite of the pressures brought to bear on the knight by the increased use of the longbow, crossbow, handgun, and pike, heavy cavalry continued to play an absolutely essential role on the battlefield. The 14th-16th century saw great chanteys in weapons and armor, not because they evolved per se, but because they changed to save their effectiveness under deferent conditions, as John Clements puts in his loudness Medieval Swordsmanship after all, swards did not get sharper, stronger, or especially more effective after the middle Ages. They did not evolve as guns did to conk more accurate, of l...