B.F. Skinner and Radical Behaviorism

B. F. muleteer, as he is known popularly, had made a great deal contri besidesion to psychological science as he made confusions and debates. In delving into mule drivers defecates, it is not affect that researching ab let out him and his ideas go forth overwhelm a student by the spacious writings on base behaviorism as well as will be lost in the confusion and humdrum of his possible action. Thus, it is important in the narrative that it should be divided into smaller units as to delineate subjects about the entirely topic. The scratch line vocalization will bridge take overer with a short biography of skinner.This will altogether trace his course but will also include some sketches of his look that may have contributed to his line of thought and thinking. Presented in the next section be some ideas about his floor behaviourism and a rather shoal understanding of it. The challengingy in here however is that as one goes deeper into primitive behaviourism, the more it is complex and confusing that the brevity of this paper will not permit. The third part is the presentation of some of the influences etymon behaviouristic psychology had made in other field of honors of national.Many authors and umpteen scholars would claim that beginning behaviourism had influenced their fields, although just some of these fields will be presented. On the next section, a presentation be made on the criticisms on theme Behavior. With a gigantic amount of literature written by B. F. mule driver, it is in no doubt that in that respect will also be a great amount of published criticisms on stem turn behaviorism and only a few have made their way here. As a whole this paper will not be an aspiring(prenominal) research about B. F.Skinner and ingrained Behaviorism but just to outcome on the surface as (1) Who is B. F. Skinner? (2) What is Radical Behaviorism? (3) What be the fields of cultivation influenced by Radical Behaviorism? , and ( 4) What are the criticisms direct towards Radical Behaviorism and to B. F. Skinner in particular? Biography Burrhus Frederic Skinner was born in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania in March 20, 1904 (Hall, Lindzey & Campbell, 1998). His mother was an profound and strong housewife and his father, a modest lawyer practicing in the field of operations (Vargas, 2004). jibe to Hall, Lindzey & Campbell (1998) as well as Vargas (2004), Skinner lived his early life with much warmth and stability his parents giving him much license on stripping and his inventiveness. As Skinners daughter, Julie S. Vargas (2004) would attest that her grandmother gave her father the freedom to discover things and to develop his abilities. On the other hand, she was also strict in kind matters, such(prenominal) as etiquette, and the young man devised many things to sustain him remember his mothers social controls (Vargas, 2004). noetheless, the family gave emphasis on well- delimitated debate over things and top ics, although they have some conservative stance on certain things. With an evoke on Literature, having been encouraged by Robert Frost, Skinner go to a small liberal arts school of Hamilton College where he majored in English, de limitined to become a writer (Hall, Lindzey & Campbell, 1998). He was not undefeated though in writing, then he left home for current York and went to Harvard University for graduate studies (Vargas, 2004).In 1931, he received his Ph. D. and moved to the University of Minnesota in 1936 for an academician position, where for 9 years he would claim and establish a nurture as one of the most influential experimental psychologists of that time (Hall, Lindzey & Campbell, 1998). He then went to the University of Indiana for a short breathe, in 1945 and returned to Harvard in 1948 to stay for the duration of his consummate career until his retirement in 1974, where he would ameliorate all his ideas and theories (Vargas, 2004).Finally, on March 18, 1990 one of the most celebrated and disputed psychologists of all time died of leukemia, leaving behind a ripple heart of his lifes work as the Operant procedures have crated entire fields of science (Vargas, 2004) Radical Behaviorism Radical Behaviorism is a term attributed to B. F. Skinner (Schneider & Morris, 1987), described as a distinction from the so-called methodological Behaviorism and the rest of psychology (Malone & Cruchon, 2001). To contrast the two kinds of behaviorism, it is noteworthy to define both.By definition, Methodological Behaviorism is the view that there is a distinction mingled with public and private events and that psychology (to remain scientific) can deal only with public events private events are mental and, therefore, beyond our reach the dry philosophy of truth by agreement (Skinner, 1945) that something is meaningful or intention only if at least two observers agree on its existence. (Malone & Cruchon, 2001) According to Skinners viewpoint, Radical Behaviorism is quite different because, it does not distinguish between private and public events.In so doing, it omits nothing unremarkably thought of as mental, but it treats seeing as an activity akin in kind to paseoing (Malone & Cruchon, 2001). This is because Skinner deny the mind/ be dualism of the mentalists and the methodological behaviorists (Malone & Cruchon, 2001). As an example, Malone and Cruchon (2001) succinctly described that Thinking is something that we do, just as is walking, and we do not think mental thoughts any more than we walk mental steps. Personal acquaintance is not necessarily private experience.That part of the world within our bodies is difficult to describe because society has a difficult time teaching us to name it. (Malone & Cruchon, 2001) In other words, Skinner departed from analyzing behaviour as actions affected by our thoughts rather he argued that thoughts are effects themselves to a degree from our actions (Malone & Cruchon, 2001). With the term behaviorism link to his ideas, he was associated with the Stimulus-Response Theory, but he repudiated it (Hall, Lindzey & Campbell, 1998) because accordingly his study of behavior should bere be as studying the interactive relationship between an existence and the environs in which it behaves. The past and present environments provide the stimuli that set the occasion for behavior, and the organisms actions operate (hence operant) on the environment. Actions have consequences, and these consequences shape the behavior of the organism. (Leahey, 2003) In addition, Skinner said that in Radical Behaviorism, it is not about the stimulus-response stance becauseInstead of saying that the organism sees, attends to, perceives, processes, or otherwise acts upon stimuli, an operant psychoanalysis holds that stimuli acquire control of behavior through the part they play in contingencies of reinforcement. Instead of saying that an organism stores copies of the contingencies to whic h it is exposed and later retrieves and responds to them again, it says that the organism is changed by the contingencies and later responds as a changed organism, the contingencies having passed into chronicle. (Skinner, 1987)That is, All operants and stimuli are members of classes of similar phenomena, defined by the environmental relations in which they participate. (Ritzer, 2005). This is gain ground said in the article Evolution of Verbal Behavior as species-specific behavior did not evolve in order that a species could adapt to the environment but rather evolved when it adapted, so we say that operant behavior is not alter by reinforcement in order that the individual can place to the environment but is strengthened when the individual adjusts.(Skinner, 1986) This is to say that Skinners Radical Behaviorism rests on the study of behavior in a sense that behavior is not caused by the stimuli but depends on the actions that a person reacts to in a certain setting (environme nt) resulting into another reaction, olibanum The environment not only triggered behavior, it selected it. Consequences seemed, indeed, to be more important than antecedents. (Skinner, 1987). round Influences by Skinners BehaviorismSurely, the influence of Radical Behaviorism in the applied fields has been proven by academic scholars in legion(predicate) research books as part or a whole of some other fields in psychology. One such field is mankind Geography, so called because it is relate with the spatial differentiation and organization of gay activity and with human use of the physical environment (Norton, 1997) and is concerned in the first place of human behavior in an environment.In here, Norton (1997) corroborated that Human Geography is related to Radical Behaviorism because the principle of pagan materialism as an approach to the study of the former is similar to latter as Radical behaviorism is concerned with the identification of the principles of individual beh avior and talks about reinforcers and punishers, while cultural materialism is concerned with group behavior and talks about benefits and costs. twain argue that behavioral responses to environmental variables precede mental rationalizations as to the reasons for responses. (Norton, 1997) Norton (1997) come on adds that the research approach of Human Geography is the analysis of behavior in landscape, advocating the use of Radical Behaviorism. Secondly, it has also influenced the approaches of the analysis of Human lore as Barnes and Holmes (1991) would contend. This is because, they said that, radical behaviorism does, on the contrary, and as debate to earlier forms of behaviorism, direct considerable attention towards phenomena called cognitive. (Barnes and Holmes, 1991), giving credit to the immenseness of the contextualistic perspective in the analysis of human thought. Further, they said that, its current burgeoning of interest in human behavior, and particularly language and symbolic control, have all the same to be full appreciated and explored (Barnes and Holmes, 1991), such that Radical Behaviorism, can play an important role in developing psychology into a fully formed science (Barnes and Holmes, 1991). Third, as formulated by Skinner, one such field influenced by Radical Behaviorism is the analysis of Verbal Behavior and communion.In the study conducted by Forsyth (1996) on the Language of Feeling, he identified Behaviorism as a good approach to such an analyses furthering understanding of the communication process. He said that the functional analysis of verbal behavior has served as the cornerstone for behavior analytic research and theory about aflame behavior beginning with how people learn to label and describe their experience using language, commending its use in clinical behaviour analysis.Fourth, an enkindle proposal of the use of Radical Behaviorism is the simulation or duplicate of a community called Walden Two (Cullen, 1991), b ased on a original by Skinner of the same title. The interesting part is that this proposal carried out for a community of disabled children having behavior deficits. This community was called Comunidad Los Horcones which was started in 1971 and has keep up to the present, followed the guiding rules based on the novel (Cullen, 1991).Cullen (1991) argued that the guiding principles of Radical Behaviorism can sustain a community, nonetheless the presence o only a handful of these kinds of community make it less seeming for practical use. In the outset, the promise that, it might provide the basis for informed cooking in the lives of people with learning disabilities (Cullen, 1991). Criticisms Skinners Radical Behaviorism came out into the academic arena without and exemption from criticisms.According to Malone and Cruchon (2001), Skinners over-simplification of in his prose on the principles of Radical Behaviorism to gain public readership caused further criticisms because those who read it misunderstood it further. They said that these criticisms are, attributable to the opacity of his prose and the excessiveness of his proposed applications (Malone & Cruchon, 2001).Thus, the writings of Skinner led to many misconceptions as well as misinterpretations of Skinners works (Ruiz, 1995). Skinner have regretted this himself later in his life as he eventually complained at having to redress misconstructions in the literature (Ruiz, 1995). On the other Ruiz (1995), argued that Radical Behaviorism attracted strong objections from feminist critics and listed the next points as basis for that criticism as misinterpretations that it is(a) a mechanistic stimulus-response psychology (b) is primarily concertned with the behavior of small organisms in experimental chambers (c) conceptualizes the organism as a passive recipient of external forces (d) denies or ignores congenital contributions to behavior in its extreme environmentalism (e) requires that we fragment behav ior down to principal(a) units of analysis and (f) deals only with overt behavior and so denies or ignores intrinsic experience such as feelings and thought. (Ruiz, 1995)Quite interestingly is that Skinners Radical Behavior, undoubtedly had been misconstrued with these labels and had been the source of fierce criticisms from many quarters (Ruiz, 1995). Furthermore, Ruizs (1995) first entry in the misinterpretation list about Radical Behaviorism as a mechanistic stimulus-response psychology, was also claimed by Hall, Lindzey and Campbell (1998). In the long run, Skinner suffered misinterpretation rather than the validity of his Radical Behaviorism as a science.All three sources would agree that Skinner was misinterpreted and misunderstood (Malone & Cruchon, 2001 Ruiz, 1995 Hall, Lindzey & Campbell, 1998), because his readers and supporters as well as critiques always place labels on approaches, techniques or methods of analyses. remainder B. F, Skinner is a remarkable scholar of the 20th century, having to influence a handful of fields of study. In retrospect, Skinner started out with a abase beginning and his upbringing may have contributed to the immense power of thinking.His Radical Behaviorism, was an attempt of Skinner to delineate his ideas from the whole of behaviorism and the rest of psychology. In such doing, a new breed of approach had taken shape. His ideas on Radical Behaviorism eventually influenced many other fields of study for application and as an approach to many experiments. On the other hand, with such a remarkable approach, B. F. Skinner and Radical Behaviorism had been attacked by many criticisms simply because of its complexity Skinner himself often over-simplify his writings to cover a wider audience that also caused much confusion and labeling on Radical Behaviorism.Nonetheless, many students and scholars also interpreted and cleared-out his ideas for better understanding such as Malone and Cruchons work (2001). Finally, Skinners Radical Behaviorism, according to most articles and marriage proposal has a great promise to give for the science of psychology. While it is a fact, as many sources would say, that Skinners works are misinterpreted and confused, there is no way that in the subsequent debates and further studies on his Radical Behaviorism that it will shed more understanding to a wider audience.Thus, it is only in the hands and minds of later scholars to interpret Skinners work more fully. References Barnes, D. , & Holmes, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. Psychological Record, 41(1), 19. Cullen, C. (1991). Experimentation and planning in community care. Disability, Handicap and Society Volume 6, No. 2 115-128. Carfax Publishing Co. Forsyth, J. (1996). The language of feeling and the feeling of anxiety Contributions of the behaviorisms toward Psychological Record, 46(4), 607. Hall, C. S. , Lindzey, G. & Campbell, J. B. (1998).Theories of constitution 4ed. Ne w York, N. Y. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Leahey, T. H. (2003). Chapter 6. Cognition and learning in Irving V. Weiners enchiridion of psychology volume 1 History of psychology. Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Malone, J. C. & Cruchon, N. M. (2001). Radical behaviorism and the rest of psychology A review/precis of Skinners About Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy Vol. 29, 31- 57. Cambridge Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. Norton, W. (1997). Human geography and behavior analysis An application of behavior analysis to the interpretation ofPsychological Record, 47(3), 439. Ritzer, G. (ed). (2005). Encyclopedia of social theory volume 1. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications Inc. Ruiz, M. R. (1995). B. F. Skinners radical behaviorism Historical misconstructions and thou for feminist reconstructions. Psychology of Women Quarterly Volume 19 161-179. EBSCO Publishing. Schneider, S. M. & Morris, E. K. (1987). A history of the term radical behaviorism From Watson to Skinner. The Beh avior Analyst Vol. 10, No. 1 27-39. Arkansas, AK University of Arkansas Skinner, B. F. (1986). The evolution of verbal behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Vol. 45, No. 1 115-122. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to the rest of psychology. American Psychologist Vol. 42, No. 8 780-786. American Psychological Association. Staats, A. W. (2003). Chapter 6. A psychological behaviorism theory of personality in Irving V. Weiners Handbook of psychology volume 5 Personality and social psychology. Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Vargas, J. S. (2004). A daughters retrospective of B. F. Skinner. The Spanish Journal of Psychology Vol. 7 No. 2 135-140. Madrid, Spain Universidad Complutense de Madrid.