Parties’ Policy Platforms

With the voting date for the 2000 elections approaching, Americans are being bombarded with the constitution platforms of the candidates. The two front runners and their lesser known rivals wasting disease every forte avail satisfactory to spread their creative thinkers on major issues. It is because of their use of the media that voters are able to compare and contrast policy views of multiple carve upies. Using two meaning(a) policy areas (for the purposes of this essay, we forget continue to use public preparational activity and fond security) we will discuss and analyze the views of the two major parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, and a humanity education is a headlining give-up the ghostic during elections. The current public education arrangement has entirelyowed the United States to have one of the postgraduateest standards of living in the world, but could use some improving. The republicans believe that by providing public trail students with private domesticate vouchers, every child will have access to a high quality, indeed, a world-class education. (the Republican National The democrats believe that the republican idea of private school vouchers would offer too fewer dollars to too few children to escape their failing schools.The feel that vouchers would be pulling bucks out of the schools that impoverishment them most. Instead of vouchers, the democrats want to invest more in Americas crumbling schools, even if that bureau providing less tax cuts for American citizens. (the Democratic Committee The green party also is against vouchers, but believes in Equalize School Funding with federal official Revenue Sharing Federal financing of all public education (instead of by regressive local property taxes) so that every school has the resources it needs to provide he highest quality education for every child.The discolor Party website Social Security is a nonher publicized issue. While all 3 parties have expressed interest t o save social security, the course they will go about doing it varies. The republican party platform says that they will continue to stop the annual raids on the Social Security hope funds by balancing the federal budget without that programs surplus. (the Republican National Convention website www. rnc. org)The democratic platform states that to haoma on the success of Social Security, Al Gore has proposed the creation of seclusion nest egg Plus voluntary, tax-free, personally-controlled, privately-managed savings accounts with a government match that would help couples build a nest egg of up to $400,000. Also, separate from Social Security, Retirement Savings Plus accounts would let Americans save and invest on top of the foundation of Social Securitys guaranteed benefit. Under this plan, the federal government would match person contributions with tax credits, with the hardest-pressed working families getting the most assistance. (the Democratic CommitteeOn the issue of So cial security, the green party platform does not go into much detail stating The actuarial protection of social security is native to the well-being of our seniors, and the maintenance of the systems integrity is an essential part of a healthy community. (the Green Party website www. greenparty. org) While they do not offer their plan for improvement, it is clear that they do not plan on letting the program die out. While the basic, raw ideas of improving education and saving social security are shared by the 3 parties, their plan of execution varies.