Bp Oil Spill

Television if full of advertisement and propaganda. As thoroughly as the internet with advertisement popups and clips on the sides of every webpage. Propaganda is information come in step up by an organization or g alto pushher overnment to promote and melodic theme or cause. Many of these ar misleading and bias, laborious to make you cogitate in the same things they do and convince you to participate in whatsoever cause they argon in. Think close to some of the commercials you seen on boob tube such as new-mades reports, movies, political ads, and recall ads.The most unforgettable to me are recall ads such as lawyers making announcements for medicines and compensation. As head as when election time comes around and all of the runners are set their names out there. Also, every day, watching the news on new crimes passing game on in the world and previews for my next favorite movie. Those are all different techniques of propaganda. The purpose of me writing this essay is to show you the propaganda in a simple informative commercial or news tie. My main steering will be on the BP rock oil spill.The first sociology theory I will compare with is symbolic interactionism. Symbolic interactionism is the use of symbols or feel to face interaction. The way that this relates to the BP oil spill is the way that the owner of the company, Kenneth R. Fineburg, verbalise that he was going to help and compensate the victims of the oil spill. Commercials and speeches were made about his plans to pay back for the damage and loss of wages that his company had ca apply the disjuncture of Mexico and victims.The second theory will be functionalism. Functionalism is the relationship between split of society. In this situation, the society came together and fought to be compensated to get their mazed wages back. Claiming they set about mortgages, bills, car payments, and children to pay for and they have non been functional in 8 months. Citizens of the affect ed area appeared on news cast and commercials were made explaining their situations, trying to reach out to someone that they needed help.The closing curtain theory is the conflict theory. Conflict theory means competition of remarkable resources or the elite control the poor and weak. This relates to this situation as the well-favoured man, Mr. Fineburg, having the money and resources to help the pile out with their lost wages. As, well his colleagues were trying to tell him that he was over compensating the victims. They had all of the control over whether or non the victims were going to be able to get paid and bailed out of this mess that one man was responsible for.In conclusion, propaganda was used in shipway to reach out to people about the real problems going on in the Gulf of Mexico during the time of the BP oil spill. I used the 3 main theories of sociology to compare how each of them relates to the oil spill. The rich over powering the poor, how society came togethe r to get help, and the interaction between the people when the term needed to be put out. RESOURCE Schwartz, J. (2011, February 17). Gulf of Mexico Oil surrender Blog. Retrieved from http//gulfofmexicooilspillblog. com/2011/02/17/gulf-of-mexico-oil-spill-blog-bp-propaganda/Bp Oil SpillBP OIL SPILL Under the Deep piddle Horizon, an seaward drilling ring of British Petroleum (BP) caused an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The incident occurred on April 20th 2010, where equipment failed and caused the explosion sinking the ring, and make the death of 11 workers and more than 17 workers injured. The British based efficiency company also faced early(a) problems at the site of the oil spill. More than 40 million gallons (estimated data) of oil spewed into the Gulf of Mexico.Oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a very serious threat for the wildlife as it causes water pollution. The oil spill effected galore(postnominal) coastal areas in the US, kindred the Louisiana, Alabama, Mississ ippi and Florida. The oil spill disaster strongly damaged wildlife bicycle in the Gulf of Mexico, and many species were thrown into extinction. Similarly, thousands of callinges were thrown into extinction. Many people has questioned the honest decisions and core value system that BP used to cut corners with the cerebrovascular accident namely, the race to maximize profits at all comprises.We are all aware that one of the main causes that let to the disaster were the result of gravely decisions, in which a less expensive option (whether to run a test or use a particular kind vitrine pipe, for example) would save lives. There has been zero dollars spent on seek concerning how to breed oil spills for off-shore drilling by BP despite the companys NET profits preceding(prenominal) and beyond all salaries, bonuses, or overhead costs- of more than $59 one thousand thousand (The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC, aired at 7 p. m.EST on June 28, Monday). The paperwork submitted to the U. S. Minerals heed Services (MMS) by BP in 2008 was 582 pages long, vatically covering all of BPs trading operations in the Gulf of Mexico. However, they omitted their ability to deal with oil spills in a worst-case scenario just to get their permits for drilling. Another very unethical act by BP was when President Obama was scheduled to visit Louisiana back than, BP hurriedly leased temporary workers and handed out gear (paper haz-mat uniforms, etc. , but told these temps not to talk to anyone. As soon as all the TV cameras and the presidents motorcade go forth the area, these for show only hires immediately stopped working (a local presidency official took photos and attempted to question a few, who advised him they were not supposed to talk to anyone, on BPs orders). They did not come back on the adjacent day or any day thereafter.On the zero dollars spent for maturation back-up systems, BP informed The Rachel Maddow Shows representative that they rely on an organizatio n which they claimed does spill research horizontal though the investigators from the show discovered the organization named by BP does not receive any money from BP nor do they do research for ways to stop oil spills. In other words, BP was unethical and lied again. This British Petroleum is listed as the fourth wealthiest corporation in the entire world, and further they lie about the extent of their spill.They fudged figures and information (against the law) in order to get a license to drill in American waters, they did not even bother to change the batteries for the system they claimed was their back-up. BP, as most oil companies (and other business), are aimed at making as much money as possible. In this case because of the big cover up the media did, BP was forced to arrive at the problem, and it is a problem that its costing them major money, both through denude up and lost product. BP has so far committed $42 billion to cleaning up.I really hope that BP (and other comp anies) learned the lesson, that cutting corners and cost reduction is not the only point that organizations should focus on. It is not safe to cut corners and presume that things will not happen. Make ethical decision, have back up plans, and worst case scenario preparation. If BP would be more ethical and do the right things either by using the latest sanctuary precautions when drilling (not cutting corners, and reducing costs), and moving faster and more dynamically when the disaster occurred, they could have avoided billions in cleanup and damages that they faced and are still facing now.The BP oil spill has offered a moment for mirror image for leading around the world about their most basic beliefs. To many people, the BP oil spill has brought home the idea that future corporate leaders must develop personal ethical standards for making decisions that go beyond just a financial calculation. There are plenty of business practices that are legal, but fall short in being ethica l. simply I believe being ethical does pay off, slowly and steadily. You may lose some opportunities, but your reputation and self-perception is invaluable.